Main Assignments:
1. Title Page
2. Introduction
4. Reflections
6. Sommary
7.
References
Bush, George W. & Paige, Ron,. (2003). No Child Left Behind . A report by the U.S. Dept of Education Washington, DC
Barnett, Michael & Keating, Thomas, (2002) Using emerging technologies to help bridge the gap between university theory and classroom practices: Challenges and successes, School Science and Mathematics 102(6) 299- 313
Barron, Ann, Kemker, Kate, Harmes, Christine and Kalaydijian, Kimberley (2003) Large scale research study on technology in K-12 schools: Technology integration as it relates to the national technology standards. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 35(4) 489-506
CEO Forum, (2001). School technology and readiness report: Key building blocks for students in the 21st century. Washington, DC: CEO Forum on Education & TechnologyChang, Chu-Yen, (2002). The Impact of Different Forms of Multimedia CAI on Student’s Science Achievement, Innovations in Education and Teaching International (IETI), Volume 39, No 4, and Pgs 280-288
Clinton, Bill,. (1997). Getting America’s Students Ready for the 21st century: Meeting the Technology Literacy Challenge . A report to the Nation on Education and Technology
Collins, Allen & Hawkins, Jan & Frederickson, John R, (1993). Three Different Views of Students: The Role of Technology in Assessing Students The Journal of Learning Sciences, Volume 3, Issue 2, p205-217
Daugherty, Michael, (2003). Advancing excellence in technological literacy: Professional development standards, Technology Teacher, 63(3) 27-31
Dimitrov, Dimiter, McGee, Steven and Howard, Bruce, (2002). Changes in Student’s Science Ability Produced by Multimedia Learning Environments: Application of the Linear Logistic Model for Change, School Science and Mathematics, Volume 101, p15-24.
International Technology Education Association (2003). Advancing Excellence in technological literacy: Student assessment, professional development and program standards, Reston,VA
Johnson, Kirk A., Ph.D. (2000). Do Computers in the Classroom Boost Academic Achievement? A Report of The Heritage Center for Data Analysis
Kulik, James A. (2003). Effects of Using Instructional Technology in Elementary and Secondary Schools: What Controlled Evaluation Studies Say. SRI International Final Report, Project Number p10446.001
Kumar, David (1996). Computers and Assessment in Computer Education: Science Mathematics and Environmental Education,
Lazarowitz, Reuven & Huppert, Jehudda (2002). Computer simulations in the high school: students’ cognitive stages, science process skills and academic achievement in microbiology. Internation Journal of Science Education, Volume 24(8) 803-821
Lehman, Jeffrey (1994). Technology Use in the Teaching of Mathematics and Science in Elementary Schools. School Science and Mathmatics, Volume 102, Issue 3, p124
Maor, Dorit (1999). Teachers as learners: The role of a multimedia professional development program in changing classroom practice. Aussie Science Teachers Journal, 45(3) 143-165
Pedretti, Erminia (1996) Learning about science, technology and society (STS) through an action research project: Co-constructing an issues-based model for STS education, School Science and Mathematics, 96(8) 432-441
Rudman, Warren & Hart, Gary (1999) New world coming: American security in the 21st century, US Commission on National Security/21st Century, Washington, DC
Trinidade, Jorge, Fiolhais, Carlos, and Almeida, Leandro, (2002). Science learning in virtual environments: a descriptive study. British Journal of Educational Technology, Volume 101, pgs. 471-488
US Census Bureau (2000). Statistical abstract of the United States. United States Census 2000, Washington, D.C, http://www.census.gov
Woolsey, Kristina & Bellamy, Rachel. (1997). Science education and technology: Opportunities to enhance student learning. The Elementary School Journal, 97(4)